Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35811 - 35820 of 65928 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 35811 - 35820 of 65928 for divorce records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion “if the record shows that the circuit court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31307 - 2007-12-26
discretion “if the record shows that the circuit court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31307 - 2007-12-26
State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
. Instead, she claimed not to know how the damage occurred. Thus, ample evidence in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
. Instead, she claimed not to know how the damage occurred. Thus, ample evidence in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the appellate record. No. 2025AP507 3 issues established a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1111818 - 2026-04-30
and the appellate record. No. 2025AP507 3 issues established a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1111818 - 2026-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(f), to which Dragisich also responded. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1137671 - 2026-07-01
. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(f), to which Dragisich also responded. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1137671 - 2026-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(f), to which Dragisich also responded. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1137671 - 2026-07-01
. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(f), to which Dragisich also responded. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1137671 - 2026-07-01
State v. Stacy L. Blunt
of the record that [Blunt] knew of his right.” Id. Although our review of the record indicates that Blunt made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11680 - 2005-03-31
of the record that [Blunt] knew of his right.” Id. Although our review of the record indicates that Blunt made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11680 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas Royster
, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court ever relied on Durfee’s statements in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court ever relied on Durfee’s statements in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
State v. Russell Stokes
, that Knighten and Clark were alibi witnesses is supported by the record, and therefore, defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
, that Knighten and Clark were alibi witnesses is supported by the record, and therefore, defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Melody L. Dallman
to dismiss this case. ¶10 Upon review of the record, this court was of the opinion that reliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18131 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss this case. ¶10 Upon review of the record, this court was of the opinion that reliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18131 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing “some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43710 - 2014-09-15
on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing “some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43710 - 2014-09-15