Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35811 - 35820 of 66174 for e j.
Search results 35811 - 35820 of 66174 for e j.
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. RULE 809.32(1)(e), (f). Upon consideration of these submissions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107905 - 2017-09-21
a supplemental no-merit report. RULE 809.32(1)(e), (f). Upon consideration of these submissions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nos. 2016AP2026-CRNM 2016AP2027-CRNM 2 report. RULE 809.32(1)(e). Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191251 - 2017-09-21
. Nos. 2016AP2026-CRNM 2016AP2027-CRNM 2 report. RULE 809.32(1)(e). Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stated: [W]e reject Holy Family’s contention that the six-year period should not begin to run until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
stated: [W]e reject Holy Family’s contention that the six-year period should not begin to run until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 534, ¶¶10-11 (citations omitted); Jay E. Grenig & Nathan Fishbach, 1 Wis. Prac., Methods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35314 - 2009-01-27
Wis. 2d 534, ¶¶10-11 (citations omitted); Jay E. Grenig & Nathan Fishbach, 1 Wis. Prac., Methods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35314 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea,” and “did not understand … the [e]ffect of the enhancement provisions and the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55527 - 2010-10-13
the plea,” and “did not understand … the [e]ffect of the enhancement provisions and the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55527 - 2010-10-13
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Hicks
validity or construction is at issue. (e) When a judge of an appellate court previously handled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9369 - 2017-09-19
validity or construction is at issue. (e) When a judge of an appellate court previously handled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9369 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV KEITH E. SCHROEDER, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242472 - 2019-06-20
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV KEITH E. SCHROEDER, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242472 - 2019-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 1995) (“[W]e may affirm on grounds different than those relied on by the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667119 - 2023-06-13
. 1995) (“[W]e may affirm on grounds different than those relied on by the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667119 - 2023-06-13