Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35811 - 35820 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.

J & W Instruments, Inc. v. Turbo Instruments, Inc.
filings. Turbo claimed that this made its failure to respond the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10671 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
” for not raising the claim in a prior filing. See State v. Allen, 2010 WI 89, ¶41, 328 Wis. 2d 1, 786 N.W.2d 124
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117034 - 2014-07-15

Beverly Drechsler v. Swendson Law, Ltd.
by the beneficiaries. We therefore conclude that the claim against Herro is frivolous as a matter of law because Love
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10408 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
There is no arguable merit to a claim to withdraw this plea. The no-merit report also addresses whether the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250840 - 2019-11-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at the postconviction hearing that she did not make the statement Robert claims she made. At a new trial, the newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68324 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, and SunTrust does not explain, how the granting of summary judgment on SunTrust’s foreclosure claim would moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112697 - 2014-05-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
GRAHAM, J.1 Garrick Griswold appeals a small claims judgment in his favor, challenging a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921183 - 2025-02-27

[PDF] Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. James E. Doyle
is the subject of Dairyland’s appeal. Although the trial court reached the merits of Dairyland’s claim
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1238 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction response to the claimed Grady violation is relevant. Grady, 302 Wis. 2d 80, ¶36; cf. Grady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33254 - 2008-07-01

State v. Melvin D. Parker, Jr.
In reviewing a speedy trial claim we first consider the length of the delay until trial. State v. Borhegyi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4522 - 2005-03-31