Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35821 - 35830 of 83461 for simple case search.
Search results 35821 - 35830 of 83461 for simple case search.
[PDF]
WI APP 135
2007 WI APP 135 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1691
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28578 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 135 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1691
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28578 - 2014-09-15
Washington County v. Carl J. Wagner
, the case proceeded to a bench trial. ¶4 Washington County, Wis., Code § 14.947.013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05
, the case proceeded to a bench trial. ¶4 Washington County, Wis., Code § 14.947.013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05
State v. Miyosha K. White
2004 WI App 237 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-1211-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 237 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-1211-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig P. Helgeland
matrix in this case. This issue involves the interpretation of § 346.65(2m). Statutory construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31
matrix in this case. This issue involves the interpretation of § 346.65(2m). Statutory construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lee D. Worby
of conviction states that Worby pled guilty in the case, he actually pled no contest. Therefore, the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2917 - 2017-09-19
of conviction states that Worby pled guilty in the case, he actually pled no contest. Therefore, the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2917 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
). The ordinance was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable. The case was returned to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33787 - 2014-09-15
). The ordinance was therefore unconstitutional and unenforceable. The case was returned to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33787 - 2014-09-15
2011 WI APP 55
2011 WI App 55 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1501 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62050 - 2011-04-19
2011 WI App 55 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1501 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62050 - 2011-04-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and not provided in the record, the parties agreed to dismiss the case on the merits. ¶9 On March 28, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83041 - 2014-09-15
and not provided in the record, the parties agreed to dismiss the case on the merits. ¶9 On March 28, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83041 - 2014-09-15
State v. Chester Gulan
identify the general objectives of greatest importance, which may vary from case to case.” Id. It must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24516 - 2006-03-21
identify the general objectives of greatest importance, which may vary from case to case.” Id. It must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24516 - 2006-03-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercised its sentencing discretion would lack arguable merit. Given the facts of this case, there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512468 - 2022-04-21
exercised its sentencing discretion would lack arguable merit. Given the facts of this case, there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512468 - 2022-04-21