Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35831 - 35840 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 35831 - 35840 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
Milwaukee County v. Robert E. Berry
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He claims: (1) that the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14922 - 2005-03-31
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He claims: (1) that the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14922 - 2005-03-31
Walworth County v. Edward John Shumak
statute. Therefore, the Shumaks' claim that the exotic animals they care for are game animals is without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10260 - 2005-03-31
statute. Therefore, the Shumaks' claim that the exotic animals they care for are game animals is without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10260 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
potential claim arising from these issues is forfeited. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
potential claim arising from these issues is forfeited. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
pleading received notice of the claim before the statute of limitations expired, and knew or should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47049 - 2014-09-15
pleading received notice of the claim before the statute of limitations expired, and knew or should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Alvin Hart
and habitual criminality, contrary to §§ 943.34(1)(a), and 939.62, STATS. Hart claims there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14375 - 2014-09-15
and habitual criminality, contrary to §§ 943.34(1)(a), and 939.62, STATS. Hart claims there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14375 - 2014-09-15
State v. Davis Garner
appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Garner claims the evidence against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5308 - 2005-03-31
appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Garner claims the evidence against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5308 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victor M. Vences
on an error of law. He claims that the recounted phone call to Vega was not hearsay evidence. See § 908.01(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11791 - 2005-03-31
on an error of law. He claims that the recounted phone call to Vega was not hearsay evidence. See § 908.01(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11791 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
requesting an order directing the attorney to inform the supreme court in writing within 20 days of any claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91963 - 2013-01-22
requesting an order directing the attorney to inform the supreme court in writing within 20 days of any claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91963 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
for supervised release after thirty years, and that the court would be bound by that recommendation. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70913 - 2011-09-14
for supervised release after thirty years, and that the court would be bound by that recommendation. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70913 - 2011-09-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a repeater. He also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. 1 Golden claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157464 - 2017-09-21
as a repeater. He also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. 1 Golden claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157464 - 2017-09-21