Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35831 - 35840 of 58253 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. contested the petitions and requested a jury trial, but later withdrew the jury trial demand. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=547553 - 2022-07-26

State v. Philip P. Sheahan
). A simple change of heart over whether to go to trial does not constitute a fair and just reason for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7235 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
. Winnig filed a demand for a trial before the circuit court, which he titled “request for hearing de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395932 - 2021-07-22

[PDF] State v. Ronnie A. Malloy
other things, carrying a concealed weapon contrary to WIS. STAT. § 941.23. ¶3 At the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17858 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
in a no-merit report. Maus filed a response to the no-merit report, arguing: (1) the trial court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12

John R. Chic v. Foots
. Chic submitted to the trial court a proposed personal injury complaint against Foots, along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9904 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 03-06 Supplemental Order - Repeal of Wis. Stats. ss. 802.05 and 814.025, and adoption of Rule 11 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in lieu thereof as amended Wis. Stat. s. 802.05 (Effective 07-01-05)
of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), Wisconsin Chapter; the Civil Trial Counsel of Wisconsin (CTCW
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18689 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
or services.3 At trial, the social worker testified that, as part of Nina’s dispositional orders in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
exercised its discretion when it permitted the domestic violence expert’s exposition testimony at trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448374 - 2021-11-03

COURT OF APPEALS
determinations “will be reversed only if the trial court’s determination represents a prejudicial misuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42964 - 2009-11-02