Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35841 - 35850 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of or summary judgment on McCarthy’s counterclaims, or that the circuit court dismissed any of those claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78840 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Order-SC
” applicable to this claim. § 9.01(11). After all, that is what the statute says. This section provides
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311669 - 2020-12-03

State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
be claimed: (1) coercion or necessity as defined in Wis. Stat. § 939.46 and Wis. Stat. § 939.47; (2) self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2008-10-23

WI App 93 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1368-CR Complete Title...
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85232 - 2013-04-29

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
and misguided. But readers can judge for themselves. Here are the claims for dismissal without a hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192530 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
of the police investigation? Can the claim that a non-testifying officer witnessed the defendant commit
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537448 - 2022-06-23

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
? Is Petitioners’ claim that DNR failed to “consider . . . cumulative impacts” when approving the wells barred
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349273 - 2021-03-22

Warner Jackson v. John T. Benson
before it imposed sanctions. Yet, "as this court has emphasized, the [frivolous claims] statute does
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17207 - 2005-03-31

State v. Terry Griffith
claim is that under the Fourth Amendment and Wis. Const. art. 1, § 11, the officer lacked lawful
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17384 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
. The question of the subject matter jurisdiction of the Maine court decisions is now barred by claim preclusion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18884 - 2005-07-05