Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35841 - 35850 of 64205 for records.
Search results 35841 - 35850 of 64205 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Buren F. Sprague
it refused to accept his offer to stipulate to his prior drunk driving record. He relies upon Old Chief v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13277 - 2017-09-21
it refused to accept his offer to stipulate to his prior drunk driving record. He relies upon Old Chief v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13277 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Clay F. Teasdale
after the issuance of a scheduling order on March 15, 2004. The record reflected that he has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16823 - 2017-09-21
after the issuance of a scheduling order on March 15, 2004. The record reflected that he has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16823 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2015AP1129-CR 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161636 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2015AP1129-CR 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161636 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John A. Rupp
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained of. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2810 - 2017-09-19
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained of. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2810 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Louis Ray
4 rationally apply the proper legal standard to the facts of record. See State v. Eckert, 203
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5187 - 2017-09-19
4 rationally apply the proper legal standard to the facts of record. See State v. Eckert, 203
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5187 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude No. 2016AP1222-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207742 - 2018-01-30
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude No. 2016AP1222-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207742 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State put on the record is what the State said.” The circuit court continued: The Court was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283233 - 2020-09-01
the State put on the record is what the State said.” The circuit court continued: The Court was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283233 - 2020-09-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the subpoenas served on one of its officers. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
the subpoenas served on one of its officers. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
is neither cited by the parties, nor does it appear to be part of the record on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31243 - 2014-09-15
is neither cited by the parties, nor does it appear to be part of the record on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Johnson, Jr.
court at Johnson’s sentencing hearing. Id. at 6. We concluded that the “record does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18238 - 2017-09-21
court at Johnson’s sentencing hearing. Id. at 6. We concluded that the “record does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18238 - 2017-09-21