Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35841 - 35850 of 55955 for so.

Mary Herr v. Rodolph J. Lanaghan
amount ought to be indicated so that we have what that all amounts to. Although the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21580 - 2006-02-23

CA Blank Order
harsh “‘only where the sentence is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97321 - 2013-05-21

[PDF] State v. Khue Xiong
, it was not unfairly so. The record demonstrates that many of the witnesses had nicknames, and witnesses would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19888 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 47
seen it wise to emulate our practice." ¶21 So what? "Everybody else is not doing it" is simply
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82165 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 10
requires. So far as the record reveals, Veolia was Malin’s only customer in Wisconsin. That relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44582 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Ron Zabel v. Vivian V. Zabel
a defendant in those actions other than a party to the marriage contract. We do not so understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11623 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
avenue for doing so is for the defendant to demonstrate a new factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427045 - 2021-09-16

State v. Will E. Edwards
of insufficient evidence “unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state and the conviction, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
In sentencing Chartier, the trial court distinguished his situation from Gray’s. In doing so, it referred again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27410 - 2006-12-19

COURT OF APPEALS
vehicle so he could administer standardized field sobriety tests. ¶5 At the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100352 - 2013-08-05