Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35851 - 35860 of 91209 for 1.
Search results 35851 - 35860 of 91209 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Dykman, Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark Larkin appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33502 - 2008-07-23
. Before Dykman, Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark Larkin appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33502 - 2008-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Thompson argues: (1) that there are new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Thompson argues: (1) that there are new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29
State v. John William Scrivner
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9797 - 2005-03-31
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9797 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Margaret S. Frafjord v. Travis C. Frafjord
: THOMAS T. FLUGAUR, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24925 - 2017-09-21
: THOMAS T. FLUGAUR, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24925 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. A jury found Demetrius D. Anderson guilty of having been a felon in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32338 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. A jury found Demetrius D. Anderson guilty of having been a felon in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32338 - 2014-09-15
Gail B. Eder v. Daniel P. Merline
abuse injunction against him. Upon reviewing the record, we disagree and affirm.[1] BACKGROUND Eder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15312 - 2005-03-31
abuse injunction against him. Upon reviewing the record, we disagree and affirm.[1] BACKGROUND Eder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15312 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a. hammer, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49114 - 2010-04-19
a. hammer, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49114 - 2010-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for Washington County: james k. muehlbauer, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Joseph Harvey Bingen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107739 - 2014-02-04
for Washington County: james k. muehlbauer, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Joseph Harvey Bingen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107739 - 2014-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
J. Fiedler, Judge. Affirmed. Before Sherman, Kloppenburg and Neubauer, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144530 - 2015-07-15
J. Fiedler, Judge. Affirmed. Before Sherman, Kloppenburg and Neubauer, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144530 - 2015-07-15
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. William Ledford appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. William Ledford appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31