Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35861 - 35870 of 57346 for id.

Chicago and North Western Transportation Company v. Office of the Commissioner of Railroads
and unambiguous, we construe the statute in accordance with its ordinary meaning. Id. at 828, 536 N.W.2d at 724
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9658 - 2005-03-31

Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
on 305 ballots, even though a statute required that each clerk initial the ballots individually.[3] Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Chicago and North Western Transportation Company v. Office of the Commissioner of Railroads
is clear and unambiguous, we construe the statute in accordance with its ordinary meaning. Id. at 828
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9658 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818006 - 2024-06-25

[PDF] WI App 147
of Edwards. See id., 451 U.S. at 485-86. Although this admission was harmless error in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin v. David Wysocki
they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. See id. If they do, we look to the opposing party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15399 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 123
; and (4) the agency’s interpretation will provide uniformity in the application of the statute. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51830 - 2010-09-28

COURT OF APPEALS
as a matter of law. Id.; Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2). ¶15 Kulcinski contends that summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42783 - 2009-10-28

[PDF] State v. James D. Miller
standard of reasonableness. Id. at 687-88; State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, No. 2005AP449 8 ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26067 - 2017-09-21

State v. Diane Borchardt
to be improperly “frozen.” Id. The state’s receipt of any “incidental benefit” from the John Doe testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11863 - 2005-03-31