Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35871 - 35880 of 63529 for records/1000.
Search results 35871 - 35880 of 63529 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Land was then handcuffed. ¶14 Based upon this record, we agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76968 - 2014-09-15
. Land was then handcuffed. ¶14 Based upon this record, we agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76968 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph White
and the facts of record. Id. Generally, evidence of prior acts will not be admitted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8314 - 2017-09-19
and the facts of record. Id. Generally, evidence of prior acts will not be admitted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8314 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to argue, without citation to the record, that the circuit court found that the officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188911 - 2017-09-21
to argue, without citation to the record, that the circuit court found that the officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188911 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
but instead review the record to determine whether it supports the circuit court’s decision. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78236 - 2012-02-21
but instead review the record to determine whether it supports the circuit court’s decision. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78236 - 2012-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court determined that provocation was inapplicable as a defense based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147020 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court determined that provocation was inapplicable as a defense based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that is not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” See WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6). Neither party argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965316 - 2025-06-04
that is not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” See WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6). Neither party argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965316 - 2025-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
an unwillingness to come out. There was “no record that there were any commands, either express or implicit, made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
an unwillingness to come out. There was “no record that there were any commands, either express or implicit, made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Reed he was required to give a sample. Based on the record before us, we agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248667 - 2019-10-16
Reed he was required to give a sample. Based on the record before us, we agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248667 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Ronan T. Heaney
the various testimonies, creating a “third version” of the facts not found in the record in order to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19
the various testimonies, creating a “third version” of the facts not found in the record in order to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19