Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35881 - 35890 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Search results 35881 - 35890 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
Wisconsin case law setting forth and applying the standard for when jurors may be removed for cause. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin case law setting forth and applying the standard for when jurors may be removed for cause. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 42
2014 WI APP 42 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP1345-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109611 - 2017-09-21
2014 WI APP 42 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP1345-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109611 - 2017-09-21
Delvin E. Bauer v. Century Surety Company
2006 WI App 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1218 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24999 - 2006-06-27
2006 WI App 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1218 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24999 - 2006-06-27
State v. Antonio J. Spencer
)(am) (1995‑96), authorizing a six‑person jury in misdemeanor cases, was unconstitutional.[5] Hansford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
)(am) (1995‑96), authorizing a six‑person jury in misdemeanor cases, was unconstitutional.[5] Hansford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
WI App 9 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP578 Complete Title of...
2014 WI App 9 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP578 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106074 - 2014-01-28
2014 WI App 9 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP578 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106074 - 2014-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (3) the circuit court failed to properly apply the law to the facts of this case. For the reasons we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108476 - 2014-02-26
; and (3) the circuit court failed to properly apply the law to the facts of this case. For the reasons we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108476 - 2014-02-26
[PDF]
Schutze Law Offices v. Joseph Gough
was correct and affirm. ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed. Schutze represented Susan Gough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16047 - 2017-09-21
was correct and affirm. ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed. Schutze represented Susan Gough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16047 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Christopher J. Klahn v. Patricia Vajgrt
and, as modified, affirmed. No. 2006AP231 2 ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.1 This is a case about a dog named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26341 - 2017-09-21
and, as modified, affirmed. No. 2006AP231 2 ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.1 This is a case about a dog named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26341 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0618-FT 96-1689-FT For Complete Title of Case, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10953 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0618-FT 96-1689-FT For Complete Title of Case, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10953 - 2017-09-19
Eliud Velez v. Jon Litscher
appears to describe authority for a case-by-case response by staff, and does not describe authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6628 - 2005-03-31
appears to describe authority for a case-by-case response by staff, and does not describe authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6628 - 2005-03-31