Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35891 - 35900 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35891 - 35900 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
WI App 75
the prejudice issue on appeal because Bell did not file a motion in the circuit court to sever the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036811 - 2026-01-26
the prejudice issue on appeal because Bell did not file a motion in the circuit court to sever the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036811 - 2026-01-26
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2 motion, Gutierrez alleged the denial of his constitutional right to an impartial jury
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263253 - 2020-07-20
2 motion, Gutierrez alleged the denial of his constitutional right to an impartial jury
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263253 - 2020-07-20
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16746 - 2005-03-31
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16746 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16732 - 2005-03-31
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16732 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730 - 2007-09-04
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to strike portions of Polfuss’s reply brief.2 BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are derived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059280 - 2026-01-13
motion to strike portions of Polfuss’s reply brief.2 BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are derived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059280 - 2026-01-13
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16758 - 2005-03-31
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16758 - 2005-03-31
Gregory G. Phelps v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
granting the defendants' motion to extend the time within which to pay their jury fee thus preserving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18674 - 2005-06-21
granting the defendants' motion to extend the time within which to pay their jury fee thus preserving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18674 - 2005-06-21
[PDF]
Gregory G. Phelps v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
granting the defendants' motion to extend the time within which to pay their jury fee thus preserving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18674 - 2017-09-21
granting the defendants' motion to extend the time within which to pay their jury fee thus preserving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18674 - 2017-09-21
State v. James R. Thiel
of the information was dismissed on November 17. ¶10 On December 15 the State filed a motion for a continuance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16516 - 2005-03-31
of the information was dismissed on November 17. ¶10 On December 15 the State filed a motion for a continuance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16516 - 2005-03-31