Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3591 - 3600 of 69847 for as he.
Search results 3591 - 3600 of 69847 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for reconsideration.1 On appeal, Lanaghan contends that he is entitled to plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013143 - 2025-09-23
motion for reconsideration.1 On appeal, Lanaghan contends that he is entitled to plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013143 - 2025-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Gray
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide of his eighteen-month-old son. He raises a single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14307 - 2014-09-15
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide of his eighteen-month-old son. He raises a single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14307 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Sims and the co-actor were masked. When D.R. stated that he did not have any money, one of the men
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708665 - 2023-10-03
Sims and the co-actor were masked. When D.R. stated that he did not have any money, one of the men
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708665 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Brian A. Jacobus
convicting him of the first-degree murder of his wife and sentencing him to prison for life. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9485 - 2017-09-19
convicting him of the first-degree murder of his wife and sentencing him to prison for life. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9485 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian A. Jacobus
for life. He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions to suppress various items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9485 - 2005-03-31
for life. He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions to suppress various items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as a party to a crime. In the first of two motions to withdraw his pleas, he alleged his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83298 - 2014-09-15
, as a party to a crime. In the first of two motions to withdraw his pleas, he alleged his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83298 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, LLC (H&J). He does not contest 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529698 - 2022-06-08
, LLC (H&J). He does not contest 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529698 - 2022-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
by use of force, as a party to a crime. In the first of two motions to withdraw his pleas, he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
by use of force, as a party to a crime. In the first of two motions to withdraw his pleas, he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for plea withdrawal. He argued that his plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
for plea withdrawal. He argued that his plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
State v. Julio G.
a bench trial and dispositional hearing. He primarily argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
a bench trial and dispositional hearing. He primarily argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31