Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3591 - 3600 of 65039 for timed.

[PDF] State v. Timothy L. Olson
denying a postconviction motion for relief. Olson seeks a 256-day sentence credit for the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14052 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Emmanuel Pettis
to the large sum of cash found on Pettis at the time of his arrest, the discovery of receipts in Pettis’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5738 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for reconsideration. Asik contends that his petition was timely under statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257781 - 2020-04-16

[PDF] Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County
on the grounds that she had not complied with § 893.80, STATS., in a timely fashion. It also concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10088 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
cognitive delays had significantly deteriorated by the time of sentencing, when compared to his I.Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946529 - 2025-04-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. It also awarded Simpson the 269 days of credit he requested for the time he spent in presentence custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04

[PDF] State v. Brenda K. Roberts
that Gitter told her that the consequences of failing the test would not include jail time because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15121 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
time for reconfinement was “unduly harsh.” We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55648 - 2010-10-18

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, would be forwarded to Brown). On January 7, 2002, Brown filed a “motion for jail time credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27436 - 2006-12-18

COURT OF APPEALS
out of and incidental to his employment at the time of his injury. We reject Westerhof’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21