Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35901 - 35910 of 58483 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 54.56. 1 ¶2 After a three-day trial, the circuit court appointed Frederick guardian, but ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149221 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
LUNDSTEN, J. Kevin Kern was convicted, following a jury trial, of one count each of attempted first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30705 - 2007-10-24

Stephen V. Hannigan v. Sundby Pharmacy, Inc.
for damages when such violations are committed “in a manner that is knowing and wilful.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14134 - 2005-03-31

WI App 56 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP786-CR Complete Titl...
. Stat. § 941.29(2) (2003-04).[2] Reynolds seeks a new trial on the grounds that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48057 - 2010-05-11

State v. Alice H.
. appeals an order of the trial court granting sole legal custody and primary physical placement of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16152 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Paul D. Hoppe
. The State of Wisconsin appeals the trial court’s order granting Paul Hoppe’s motion to suppress all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2802 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
A jury trial on Rathbun’s counterclaims and third-party claims was scheduled for the first week of March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71457 - 2011-09-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
their introduction at trial would violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. ¶17 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697751 - 2023-08-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
serve as an offset against Rathbun’s recovery. ¶9 A jury trial on Rathbun’s counterclaims and third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71457 - 2014-09-15

[MS WORD] TR-311: Order on Motion to Reopen Traffic Forfeiture
] . THE COURT FINDS: |_| 1. The defendant’s request is timely made (20 days from trial date or 6 months from
/formdisplay/TR-311.doc?formNumber=TR-311&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-06-22