Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35911 - 35920 of 65933 for divorce records/1000.

[PDF] Phaedra P. v. Dennis A.
because it is based upon the UCCJA and the UCCJA is preempted by the PKPA. However, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7165 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818007 - 2024-06-25

Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
, this Court holds that their [sic] is substantial and credible evidence in the record to support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13012 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, and we can discern none from the record, why those issues were not raised previously, either in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34069 - 2008-09-22

State v. Joachim E. Dressler
to seizure and admission of protected materials. If the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07

08AP125 State v. Alan C. Quam.doc
because there is no court record available of the 1992 drunk driving case and the screen shots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33707 - 2008-08-12

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Court Order of 6/24/24
or the parties,8 nor was any record made of the communications then or thereafter. Inexplicably, the report
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=818780 - 2024-06-24

[PDF] Frontsheet
5 him, and reviewed his records. Dr. Dave stated his conclusion to a reasonable degree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253508 - 2020-02-04

Donald E. Cavanaugh v. Robert Andrade
, Cavanaugh and the City stipulated orally on the record that the damages consisted of $50,000 for James' loss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16896 - 2005-03-31