Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35921 - 35930 of 62078 for child support.
Search results 35921 - 35930 of 62078 for child support.
State v. Carl D. Porter
. The lineup photograph, however, does not support Porter's contention. True, Porter was the tallest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10684 - 2005-03-31
. The lineup photograph, however, does not support Porter's contention. True, Porter was the tallest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10684 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not cite any authority to support an argument that the circuit court in this case, the Hon. Frank
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996874 - 2025-08-14
not cite any authority to support an argument that the circuit court in this case, the Hon. Frank
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996874 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
Martial Ledvina v. Scott Puksich
. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). ¶9 The record supports the trial court’s findings of fact. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7376 - 2017-09-20
. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). ¶9 The record supports the trial court’s findings of fact. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7376 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. It then noted that a number of people had sent in supportive letters. However, the court was concerned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865604 - 2024-10-23
. It then noted that a number of people had sent in supportive letters. However, the court was concerned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865604 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
Irene Rafalski v. Edward Dusza
was egregious and support the trial court's exercise of its discretion when entering a default judgment against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7728 - 2017-09-19
was egregious and support the trial court's exercise of its discretion when entering a default judgment against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7728 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas R. Kinnaman
concluded that Kinnaman's arrest was supported by probable cause and revoked his operating privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10903 - 2017-09-20
concluded that Kinnaman's arrest was supported by probable cause and revoked his operating privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10903 - 2017-09-20
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79587 - 2012-03-12
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79587 - 2012-03-12
Pastori M. Balele v. Allstate Insurance Company
Deposition testimony supports the trial court’s conclusion that Balele could not prove the number of thefts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15965 - 2005-03-31
Deposition testimony supports the trial court’s conclusion that Balele could not prove the number of thefts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
EDUCATION SUPPORT PERSONNEL ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT-CO-APPELLANT. APPEALS from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26772 - 2014-09-15
EDUCATION SUPPORT PERSONNEL ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT-CO-APPELLANT. APPEALS from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26772 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James L. Ard v. Patricia A. Ard
to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decision, not for evidence to support findings the court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decision, not for evidence to support findings the court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21