Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35921 - 35930 of 63530 for records/1000.
Search results 35921 - 35930 of 63530 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Lynne Layber
. The record does not support the State’s argument. When Layber’s attorney argued to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13963 - 2014-09-15
. The record does not support the State’s argument. When Layber’s attorney argued to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13963 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” Noting that it considered the maximum forty- year sentence justified by the record were the court so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34314 - 2014-09-15
.” Noting that it considered the maximum forty- year sentence justified by the record were the court so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34314 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
report, although that report was not in the record.4 The information’s accuracy that Machicote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28315 - 2014-09-15
report, although that report was not in the record.4 The information’s accuracy that Machicote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28315 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment right against self-incrimination, when considered in the context of the entire record. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
Amendment right against self-incrimination, when considered in the context of the entire record. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
Daniel J. Lenhart v. Robert L. Kisting
into the record. The Lenharts’ attorney then asked Kisting whether the answer was truthful and “[y]ou didn’t tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11979 - 2005-03-31
into the record. The Lenharts’ attorney then asked Kisting whether the answer was truthful and “[y]ou didn’t tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11979 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
in the record suggesting that Stein pressured or threatened the boy to tell him if there was a gun in the home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
in the record suggesting that Stein pressured or threatened the boy to tell him if there was a gun in the home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536683 - 2022-06-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536683 - 2022-06-29
State v. Paul Matek
that he based his diagnosis on Matek’s criminal and medical records, including interviews with the staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
that he based his diagnosis on Matek’s criminal and medical records, including interviews with the staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
Lincoln County v. April G.
toward meeting the conditions for Cheyenne’s return and was supported by the record. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15890 - 2005-03-31
toward meeting the conditions for Cheyenne’s return and was supported by the record. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15890 - 2005-03-31
Donald Murtaugh v. State
director, Dr. George Daley. The record is unclear whether Daley actually examined Murtaugh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
director, Dr. George Daley. The record is unclear whether Daley actually examined Murtaugh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31