Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35931 - 35940 of 47113 for shows.
Search results 35931 - 35940 of 47113 for shows.
State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
, the party who sought the continuance shows that impeaching or contradictory evidence could probably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31
, the party who sought the continuance shows that impeaching or contradictory evidence could probably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is rebuttable, but the burden is on the petitioner to show by clear and convincing evidence the intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05
is rebuttable, but the burden is on the petitioner to show by clear and convincing evidence the intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court’s decision has not been appealed. [3] The record shows that the Town alternatively filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31212 - 2007-12-18
of the circuit court’s decision has not been appealed. [3] The record shows that the Town alternatively filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31212 - 2007-12-18
State v. Cory D. Wood
, the officers ordered him to show his hands before they approached him. Once Schoeni made physical contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9753 - 2005-03-31
, the officers ordered him to show his hands before they approached him. Once Schoeni made physical contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9753 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wesley J. LaCrosse, Jr.
in the light most favorable to the State, we conclude that the facts established at trial fail to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15431 - 2005-03-31
in the light most favorable to the State, we conclude that the facts established at trial fail to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15431 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eddie L. Thomas
the ‘prejudice’ requirement, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31
the ‘prejudice’ requirement, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31
William J. Dekker v. Dennis M. Wergin
the relief sought by his [claim] he must show that he made use of and exhausted the opportunities available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692 - 2005-03-31
the relief sought by his [claim] he must show that he made use of and exhausted the opportunities available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bobby J. Kemper
motion hearing can be used by the State to meet its burden to show by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21001 - 2006-01-24
motion hearing can be used by the State to meet its burden to show by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21001 - 2006-01-24
William J. Gregg v. Duane H. Pedersen
the burden of proof upon the true owner to show that it was permissive.”[1] The Pedersens claim the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6756 - 2005-03-31
the burden of proof upon the true owner to show that it was permissive.”[1] The Pedersens claim the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6756 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry C.O.
to deny Jerry C.O.’s suppression motion. The undisputed evidence shows that the police uncovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
to deny Jerry C.O.’s suppression motion. The undisputed evidence shows that the police uncovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31