Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35941 - 35950 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35941 - 35950 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
Mark R. Voss v. Sentry Insurance
and Walter O’Haver appeal from a judgment granting Sentry Insurance’s motion for summary judgment. Voss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11246 - 2005-03-31
and Walter O’Haver appeal from a judgment granting Sentry Insurance’s motion for summary judgment. Voss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11246 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 denying his motion to suppress evidence because, he asserts, the officer lacked the necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27979 - 2014-09-15
2 denying his motion to suppress evidence because, he asserts, the officer lacked the necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
about getting a better plea deal. The trial court denied a motion to have Wilder examined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244527 - 2019-07-30
about getting a better plea deal. The trial court denied a motion to have Wilder examined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244527 - 2019-07-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
CURIAM. Javier Salazar appeals from an order summarily denying a motion to vacate his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44866 - 2014-09-15
CURIAM. Javier Salazar appeals from an order summarily denying a motion to vacate his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44866 - 2014-09-15
State v. David V. Pugh, Sr.
motion to suppress evidence based on lack of probable cause to arrest. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
motion to suppress evidence based on lack of probable cause to arrest. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
line, and then drifting back to the right fog line “with a back-and-forth motion.” Galipo decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133091 - 2015-01-20
line, and then drifting back to the right fog line “with a back-and-forth motion.” Galipo decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133091 - 2015-01-20
CA Blank Order
appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to have his sentence reduced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132561 - 2015-01-06
appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to have his sentence reduced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132561 - 2015-01-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
to grant relief based on “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” but only if a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31024 - 2014-09-15
to grant relief based on “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” but only if a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154331 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154331 - 2017-09-21
State v. James C.M.
24, 1997. On November 11, 1997, the State filed a motion “to lift stay.” (Uppercasing omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
24, 1997. On November 11, 1997, the State filed a motion “to lift stay.” (Uppercasing omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31