Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35951 - 35960 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35951 - 35960 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. David V. Pugh, Sr.
motion to suppress evidence based on lack of probable cause to arrest. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
motion to suppress evidence based on lack of probable cause to arrest. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
line, and then drifting back to the right fog line “with a back-and-forth motion.” Galipo decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133091 - 2015-01-20
line, and then drifting back to the right fog line “with a back-and-forth motion.” Galipo decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133091 - 2015-01-20
CA Blank Order
appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to have his sentence reduced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132561 - 2015-01-06
appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to have his sentence reduced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132561 - 2015-01-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
to grant relief based on “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” but only if a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31024 - 2014-09-15
to grant relief based on “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” but only if a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154331 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154331 - 2017-09-21
State v. James C.M.
24, 1997. On November 11, 1997, the State filed a motion “to lift stay.” (Uppercasing omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
24, 1997. On November 11, 1997, the State filed a motion “to lift stay.” (Uppercasing omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Century 21 Gold Award Homes v. Steve Camden
judgment motion and ruled that the Camdens were liable for the brokerage commission. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12938 - 2017-09-21
judgment motion and ruled that the Camdens were liable for the brokerage commission. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12938 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
arrested for OWI. ¶4 Senger filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that Schulteis did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76600 - 2012-01-17
arrested for OWI. ¶4 Senger filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that Schulteis did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76600 - 2012-01-17
State v. Rodney R. Clark
)(b).[1] He also appeals from the denial of his postconviction motion. Clark argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
)(b).[1] He also appeals from the denial of his postconviction motion. Clark argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
State v. Adam S. Witczak
. Witczak is appealing the denial of his motion to suppress all evidence derived from his detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13428 - 2005-03-31
. Witczak is appealing the denial of his motion to suppress all evidence derived from his detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13428 - 2005-03-31