Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35951 - 35960 of 51893 for him.
Search results 35951 - 35960 of 51893 for him.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
of the charges. He further asserted that his trial attorney did not explain the elements of the charges to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28489 - 2007-03-11
of the charges. He further asserted that his trial attorney did not explain the elements of the charges to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28489 - 2007-03-11
Town of La Prairie v. Mule Hill Materials & Nursery, Inc.
or thereabout, Hill stated that Hughes had called him, but he told Hughes “that he could not open a gravel pit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-03-31
or thereabout, Hill stated that Hughes had called him, but he told Hughes “that he could not open a gravel pit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-03-31
State v. Walter J. Griffin
PER CURIAM. Walter Griffin appeals from a judgment convicting him as a party to the crime of check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2010-03-22
PER CURIAM. Walter Griffin appeals from a judgment convicting him as a party to the crime of check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2010-03-22
State v. Dariell D. Cross
appeals from a judgment convicting him of battery by a prisoner contrary to § 940.20(1), Stats. Cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment convicting him of battery by a prisoner contrary to § 940.20(1), Stats. Cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. John W. Moore
of the circuit court convicting him of disorderly conduct contrary to Madison General Ordinance § 32.03. Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5159 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court convicting him of disorderly conduct contrary to Madison General Ordinance § 32.03. Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5159 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
residency: [B]ut I heard you say, Judge, we’re concerned there’s the possibility that you sentenced him more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112578 - 2005-03-31
residency: [B]ut I heard you say, Judge, we’re concerned there’s the possibility that you sentenced him more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112578 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is entitled to a new trial because a witness against him has recanted her testimony. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
that he is entitled to a new trial because a witness against him has recanted her testimony. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
him should be invalidated because he received inadequate notice. This appeal is undeveloped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95670 - 2013-04-22
him should be invalidated because he received inadequate notice. This appeal is undeveloped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95670 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to him for the purpose of satisfying his personal tax liability on the corporation’s earnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140994 - 2017-09-21
to him for the purpose of satisfying his personal tax liability on the corporation’s earnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 126
sent him a notice informing him that [t]here [was] a possibility that [his] application may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68147 - 2014-09-15
sent him a notice informing him that [t]here [was] a possibility that [his] application may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68147 - 2014-09-15