Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35951 - 35960 of 82212 for judgment for m s.
Search results 35951 - 35960 of 82212 for judgment for m s.
COURT OF APPEALS
Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45467 - 2010-01-11
Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45467 - 2010-01-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. For the petitioner-respondent, the caused was argued by Winn S. Collins, assistant attorney general, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158428 - 2017-09-21
. For the petitioner-respondent, the caused was argued by Winn S. Collins, assistant attorney general, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158428 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: VICKI L. CLUSSMAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211024 - 2018-04-12
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: VICKI L. CLUSSMAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211024 - 2018-04-12
[PDF]
Adrian Lomax v. Patrick Fiedler
a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Dane (If "Special" JUDGE: Michael N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9551 - 2017-09-19
a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Dane (If "Special" JUDGE: Michael N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9551 - 2017-09-19
Adrian Lomax v. Patrick Fiedler
of APPEAL Appeal from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9551 - 2005-03-31
of APPEAL Appeal from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
, the decision brought up for review. No. 02-0596 7 represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5003 - 2017-09-19
, the decision brought up for review. No. 02-0596 7 represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5003 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frank P. Howard
COUNTY: Waukesha JUDGE: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR. JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16996 - 2005-03-31
COUNTY: Waukesha JUDGE: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR. JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16996 - 2005-03-31
Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5003 - 2005-03-31
and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5003 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frank P. Howard
JUDGE: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR. JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16996 - 2017-09-21
JUDGE: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR. JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16996 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 22
of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Elizabeth M. Fors, Peter A. Schmit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913339 - 2025-04-21
of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Elizabeth M. Fors, Peter A. Schmit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913339 - 2025-04-21