Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35951 - 35960 of 68202 for law.

Steven Staudt v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
, and, if not, whether a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 802.08(2), Stats.; U.S. Oil Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11986 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patricia Marie F-K.
of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15037 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of an ineffective assistance claim as a mixed question of fact and law.” See State v. Kimbrough, 2001 WI App 138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102213 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Fitzroy Donaldson
Drug Tax Stamp law. The circuit court, stating that Donaldson had had many opportunities to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13410 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael R. Remmel
). This claim presents a mixed question of fact and law. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. The circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19253 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
is reasonable and whether more than one reasonable inference may be drawn are questions of law. Id. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34073 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We will not upset the trial court’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35560 - 2014-09-15

State Bank of Cross Plains v. Douglas J. Garavalia
to dismiss under the relevant case law. DISCUSSION ¶8 Douglas first contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25276 - 2006-05-24

COURT OF APPEALS
-year- old woman suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. The victim’s brother-in-law, Robert R., testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46611 - 2010-02-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the court followed the correct statutory procedure, a question of law. See Mared Indus., Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194155 - 2017-09-21