Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35961 - 35970 of 65973 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 35961 - 35970 of 65973 for motion to dismiss.
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Jones filed prior postconviction motions and had a direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104257 - 2013-11-18
his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Jones filed prior postconviction motions and had a direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104257 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
Eddie Cannon v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
motion for replevin seeking the return of property. He argues that the trial court erred in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7768 - 2017-09-19
motion for replevin seeking the return of property. He argues that the trial court erred in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7768 - 2017-09-19
State v. Glenn Turner
),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7227 - 2005-03-31
),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7227 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
it ruled on several pretrial motions. A jury trial was held on August 14, 2007; however, a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34031 - 2008-09-16
it ruled on several pretrial motions. A jury trial was held on August 14, 2007; however, a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34031 - 2008-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bryan Bagstad appeals an order that denied Bagstad’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687523 - 2023-08-10
. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bryan Bagstad appeals an order that denied Bagstad’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687523 - 2023-08-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion. Claudio alleges that his appellate counsel’s ineffectiveness for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32546 - 2014-09-15
motion. Claudio alleges that his appellate counsel’s ineffectiveness for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32546 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for resentencing. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Salinas was charged with repeated sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143393 - 2017-09-21
motion for resentencing. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Salinas was charged with repeated sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143393 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
publicly reprimanded and motion denied. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this reciprocal discipline matter, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144229 - 2015-07-08
publicly reprimanded and motion denied. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this reciprocal discipline matter, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144229 - 2015-07-08
Frontsheet
publicly reprimanded and motion denied. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this reciprocal discipline matter, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144224 - 2015-07-08
publicly reprimanded and motion denied. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this reciprocal discipline matter, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144224 - 2015-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2011-12).[1] He also appeals the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143393 - 2015-06-22
. See Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2011-12).[1] He also appeals the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143393 - 2015-06-22