Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35971 - 35980 of 68958 for j o e y.
Search results 35971 - 35980 of 68958 for j o e y.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, J., delivered the majority opinion of the court, in which ROGGENSACK, C.J., ZIEGLER and KELLY, JJ
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251808 - 2019-12-27
, J., delivered the majority opinion of the court, in which ROGGENSACK, C.J., ZIEGLER and KELLY, JJ
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251808 - 2019-12-27
Frontsheet
, III Justices: Concurred: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concurs (opinion filed). BRADLEY, J., joins
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50278 - 2010-05-23
, III Justices: Concurred: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concurs (opinion filed). BRADLEY, J., joins
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50278 - 2010-05-23
Frontsheet
: Robert J. Wirtz Justices: Concurred: Dissented: BRADLEY, J., dissents (opinion filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36312 - 2009-04-27
: Robert J. Wirtz Justices: Concurred: Dissented: BRADLEY, J., dissents (opinion filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36312 - 2009-04-27
Frontsheet
by Valerie J. Revnew and Epiphany Law, LLC, Appleton, and oral argument by Valerie J. Revnew. 2013 WI 72
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99359 - 2013-07-11
by Valerie J. Revnew and Epiphany Law, LLC, Appleton, and oral argument by Valerie J. Revnew. 2013 WI 72
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99359 - 2013-07-11
[PDF]
WI APP 13
, which both fall under the same statutory provision, WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1)(e) (2021-22), and carry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760452 - 2024-04-10
, which both fall under the same statutory provision, WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1)(e) (2021-22), and carry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760452 - 2024-04-10
[PDF]
WI APP 52
of Cynthia E. Smith, chief legal counsel, and Zachary Peters 2 and Stephanie Bedford, assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835405 - 2024-10-17
of Cynthia E. Smith, chief legal counsel, and Zachary Peters 2 and Stephanie Bedford, assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835405 - 2024-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. ¶1 GRAHAM, J.1 Antwan Gill appeals a judgment of conviction for possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=642006 - 2023-04-06
. Affirmed. ¶1 GRAHAM, J.1 Antwan Gill appeals a judgment of conviction for possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=642006 - 2023-04-06
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was argued by Gregory M. Posner-Weber, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17520 - 2017-09-21
was argued by Gregory M. Posner-Weber, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was argued by Gregory M. Posner-Weber, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17518 - 2017-09-21
was argued by Gregory M. Posner-Weber, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
was argued by Gregory M. Posner-Weber, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17515 - 2017-09-21
was argued by Gregory M. Posner-Weber, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17515 - 2017-09-21