Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35991 - 36000 of 91512 for 1.
Search results 35991 - 36000 of 91512 for 1.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm. While on extended supervision in a prior case, Kruizenga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932715 - 2025-03-26
. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm. While on extended supervision in a prior case, Kruizenga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932715 - 2025-03-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
: TIMOTHY M. WITKOWIAK, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer1 and Fine, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33697 - 2014-09-15
: TIMOTHY M. WITKOWIAK, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer1 and Fine, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33697 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Rosborough, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Dykman and Vergeront, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26926 - 2006-10-25
. Rosborough, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Dykman and Vergeront, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26926 - 2006-10-25
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
in entrusting their vehicle to him.[1] Fritz’s parents filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
in entrusting their vehicle to him.[1] Fritz’s parents filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
Village of Shorewood Hills v. Kenneth R. McGrew
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: PATRICK J. FIEDLER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3450 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: PATRICK J. FIEDLER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3450 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of Portage County (L.C. #2012SC481) Before Kloppenburg, J.[1] Joshua Baumgarten, pro se, appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108714 - 2014-03-03
of Portage County (L.C. #2012SC481) Before Kloppenburg, J.[1] Joshua Baumgarten, pro se, appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108714 - 2014-03-03
State v. Corey O. Mackin
remanded for further proceedings. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7592 - 2005-03-31
remanded for further proceedings. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Oconto County: RICHARD DELFORGE, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.1 Aaron Lear appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35549 - 2014-09-15
for Oconto County: RICHARD DELFORGE, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.1 Aaron Lear appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35549 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2023-24).1 Olivarez was advised of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921949 - 2025-03-04
(2023-24).1 Olivarez was advised of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921949 - 2025-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Thompson argues: (1) that there are new factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Thompson argues: (1) that there are new factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29