Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35991 - 36000 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 35991 - 36000 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218230 - 2018-08-29
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218230 - 2018-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
surcharge to support a motion vacating the surcharge imposed in the instant case. Next, Neal’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15
surcharge to support a motion vacating the surcharge imposed in the instant case. Next, Neal’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the victims in this case (“Sam,” “Keith,” and “Ronald”). No. 2022AP337 3 denied Brim’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
to the victims in this case (“Sam,” “Keith,” and “Ronald”). No. 2022AP337 3 denied Brim’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
Paul J. May v. Tri-County Trails Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12145 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12145 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
32, ¶29, 270 Wis. 2d 146, 677 N.W.2d 233 (collecting cases). ¶11 One exception to the economic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234113 - 2019-02-06
32, ¶29, 270 Wis. 2d 146, 677 N.W.2d 233 (collecting cases). ¶11 One exception to the economic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234113 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts of this case and our decision in Ellis. ¶6 In this appeal, we must apply the language of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227127 - 2018-11-21
the facts of this case and our decision in Ellis. ¶6 In this appeal, we must apply the language of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227127 - 2018-11-21
[PDF]
Lloyd M. Morey Trust v. Robert Morey
been to allow parties to bring relevant cases which are decided after the briefs have been submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15590 - 2017-09-21
been to allow parties to bring relevant cases which are decided after the briefs have been submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15590 - 2017-09-21
State v. Parish D. Perkins
court in this case concluded that Perkins had not met either prong of the Strickland test. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14137 - 2005-03-31
court in this case concluded that Perkins had not met either prong of the Strickland test. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14137 - 2005-03-31
1522 on the Lake v. Nella Groysman
court sent out a notice scheduling a pre-trial conference. The notice stated: This case is scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26130 - 2006-08-07
court sent out a notice scheduling a pre-trial conference. The notice stated: This case is scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26130 - 2006-08-07
COURT OF APPEALS
an incorrect legal standard. Id. The interpretation and application of statutes and case law to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35230 - 2009-01-20
an incorrect legal standard. Id. The interpretation and application of statutes and case law to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35230 - 2009-01-20