Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 361 - 370 of 9541 for jurors.
Search results 361 - 370 of 9541 for jurors.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discuss this juror. The other struck juror, J.H., was removed as a peremptory strike by the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282259 - 2020-08-27
discuss this juror. The other struck juror, J.H., was removed as a peremptory strike by the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282259 - 2020-08-27
State v. Vance Ferron
. Ferron contends the trial court committed reversible error when it refused to strike a prospective juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11765 - 2005-03-31
. Ferron contends the trial court committed reversible error when it refused to strike a prospective juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 175
-in-law on the panel of potential jurors. The daughter-in-law was not seated on the jury because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56998 - 2014-09-15
-in-law on the panel of potential jurors. The daughter-in-law was not seated on the jury because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56998 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 175
-in-law on the panel of potential jurors. The daughter-in-law was not seated on the jury because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
-in-law on the panel of potential jurors. The daughter-in-law was not seated on the jury because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Reinaldo R.P.
During deliberations, the jury sent the court a note inquiring, “Does [sic] the same 10 jurors have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3666 - 2005-03-31
During deliberations, the jury sent the court a note inquiring, “Does [sic] the same 10 jurors have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was denied his right to a unanimous jury verdict after one of the jurors asked to talk to the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648358 - 2023-04-25
was denied his right to a unanimous jury verdict after one of the jurors asked to talk to the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648358 - 2023-04-25
State v. Steven S. Miller
intoxicated. He argues that the trial court’s refusal to strike a prospective juror for cause when it became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated. He argues that the trial court’s refusal to strike a prospective juror for cause when it became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven S. Miller
. He argues that the trial court’s refusal to strike a prospective juror for cause when it became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16219 - 2017-09-21
. He argues that the trial court’s refusal to strike a prospective juror for cause when it became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16219 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Engens’ motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct. We conclude, under the applicable standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106494 - 2017-09-21
the Engens’ motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct. We conclude, under the applicable standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106494 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying the Engens’ motion for a new trial based on juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106494 - 2014-01-08
the court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying the Engens’ motion for a new trial based on juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106494 - 2014-01-08