Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 361 - 370 of 60433 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 361 - 370 of 60433 for quit claim deed/1000.
Anton F. Schorsch v. James Blader
of warranty of title, for land it attempted to convey. The District claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10752 - 2005-03-31
of warranty of title, for land it attempted to convey. The District claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10752 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Anton F. Schorsch v. James Blader
from a breach of warranty of title, for land it attempted to convey. The District claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20
from a breach of warranty of title, for land it attempted to convey. The District claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Carol L. Dodge v. James M. Schneider
from the judgment entered in the circuit court that dismissed her claim to a piece of real property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7250 - 2017-09-20
from the judgment entered in the circuit court that dismissed her claim to a piece of real property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7250 - 2017-09-20
Carol L. Dodge v. James M. Schneider
claim to a piece of real property. She argues on appeal that the circuit court improperly granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7250 - 2005-03-31
claim to a piece of real property. She argues on appeal that the circuit court improperly granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7250 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of James Koeferl appeals the final order resolving Christine Oleinik’s[1] claims against the Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90809 - 2012-12-17
of James Koeferl appeals the final order resolving Christine Oleinik’s[1] claims against the Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90809 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims; (11) he is entitled to punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11916 - 2017-09-21
a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims; (11) he is entitled to punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11916 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims; (11) he is entitled to punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21
a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims; (11) he is entitled to punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims; (11) he is entitled to punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12656 - 2017-09-21
a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims; (11) he is entitled to punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12656 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Przytarski’s $1000 claim was frivolous. Because the trial court did not, and could not, make the safe harbor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
that Przytarski’s $1000 claim was frivolous. Because the trial court did not, and could not, make the safe harbor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
finding that Przytarski’s $1000 claim was frivolous. Because the trial court did not, and could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46257 - 2014-09-15
finding that Przytarski’s $1000 claim was frivolous. Because the trial court did not, and could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46257 - 2014-09-15