Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3601 - 3610 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3601 - 3610 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals the circuit court’s order denying her motions to reopen an action dismissed on April 17, 2015
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186495 - 2017-09-21
, appeals the circuit court’s order denying her motions to reopen an action dismissed on April 17, 2015
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186495 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Sexton’s custodial status to the jury panel and the court failed to give a curative instruction. Sexton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71225 - 2014-09-15
Sexton’s custodial status to the jury panel and the court failed to give a curative instruction. Sexton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71225 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
denied his motion to suppress the gun and marijuana. We affirm his No. 01-2797-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
denied his motion to suppress the gun and marijuana. We affirm his No. 01-2797-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial after a prospective juror revealed Sexton’s custodial status to the jury panel and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71225 - 2011-09-26
a mistrial after a prospective juror revealed Sexton’s custodial status to the jury panel and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71225 - 2011-09-26
Douglas County v. Michael R.L.
. According to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7666 - 2005-03-31
. According to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas County v. Michael R.L.
to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3:15 p.m. because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3:15 p.m. because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171869 - 2017-09-21
and from an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chad A. Achterberg
to enter a judgment on an order forfeiting bail absent a motion by the district attorney when
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16972 - 2017-09-21
to enter a judgment on an order forfeiting bail absent a motion by the district attorney when
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16972 - 2017-09-21
State v. David R. Olofson
that the resulting search of Olofson’s car was justified. The trial court did not erroneously deny Olofson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2005-03-31
that the resulting search of Olofson’s car was justified. The trial court did not erroneously deny Olofson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2005-03-31