Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3601 - 3610 of 12873 for se.
Search results 3601 - 3610 of 12873 for se.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the substantial battery charge served as the basis for a sentence enhancer. In 2012, Pophal filed a “Pro Se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116810 - 2017-09-21
, and the substantial battery charge served as the basis for a sentence enhancer. In 2012, Pophal filed a “Pro Se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116810 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. David E. Bowers, Sr., pro se, appeals the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106252 - 2014-01-06
., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. David E. Bowers, Sr., pro se, appeals the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106252 - 2014-01-06
CA Blank Order
Higginbotham, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. Mary Searing, pro se, appeals a circuit court order modifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144487 - 2015-07-12
Higginbotham, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. Mary Searing, pro se, appeals a circuit court order modifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144487 - 2015-07-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Powell, Jr., pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion to waive the Milwaukee County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573745 - 2022-10-04
Powell, Jr., pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion to waive the Milwaukee County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573745 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
CURIAM. Ralph E. Griffin appeals pro se from an amended order denying his motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28474 - 2014-09-15
CURIAM. Ralph E. Griffin appeals pro se from an amended order denying his motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28474 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Vernon and Carolyn Borst, pro se, appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88574 - 2012-10-22
, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Vernon and Carolyn Borst, pro se, appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88574 - 2012-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Stephen Lush, pro se, appeals a circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752008 - 2024-01-19
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Stephen Lush, pro se, appeals a circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752008 - 2024-01-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
., Neubauer, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Gene R. Olsen appeals pro se from a circuit court order dismissing his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122595 - 2014-10-01
., Neubauer, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Gene R. Olsen appeals pro se from a circuit court order dismissing his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122595 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
Moreal T. Wilson v. Kenneth Morgan
Wilson, pro se, appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2937 - 2017-09-19
Wilson, pro se, appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2937 - 2017-09-19
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation v. Dennis Maxberry
WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Dennis Maxberry appeals pro se from a judgment of replevin ordering that Maxberry’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26375 - 2006-09-05
WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Dennis Maxberry appeals pro se from a judgment of replevin ordering that Maxberry’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26375 - 2006-09-05