Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3601 - 3610 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3601 - 3610 of 58458 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
he had been charged and was awaiting trial. Rodriguez told this to Scott through another inmate who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32179 - 2008-03-24
he had been charged and was awaiting trial. Rodriguez told this to Scott through another inmate who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32179 - 2008-03-24
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy K. Morse
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Morse claims: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19356 - 2017-09-21
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Morse claims: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19356 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying postconviction relief. Metcaffe asserts that he is entitled to a new trial because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675537 - 2023-07-05
denying postconviction relief. Metcaffe asserts that he is entitled to a new trial because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675537 - 2023-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
seeks resentencing, arguing that: the trial court failed to adequately explain its reasons for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145097 - 2015-07-27
seeks resentencing, arguing that: the trial court failed to adequately explain its reasons for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145097 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Parish D. Perkins
of trial counsel. Because we conclude that he forfeited No. 98-1677-CR 2 his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14137 - 2014-09-15
of trial counsel. Because we conclude that he forfeited No. 98-1677-CR 2 his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14137 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 162
entered on the first day of his jury trial and the imposition of a DNA surcharge at sentencing.[1] First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56197 - 2010-12-19
entered on the first day of his jury trial and the imposition of a DNA surcharge at sentencing.[1] First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56197 - 2010-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, following a jury trial, convicting him of one count of first-degree reckless injury with use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228767 - 2018-12-04
of conviction, following a jury trial, convicting him of one count of first-degree reckless injury with use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228767 - 2018-12-04
[PDF]
State v. Allen Tony Davis
Davis of the right to a unanimous verdict; (3) the trial court erred in admitting other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13443 - 2017-09-21
Davis of the right to a unanimous verdict; (3) the trial court erred in admitting other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13443 - 2017-09-21
State v. Allen Tony Davis
Davis of the right to a unanimous verdict; (3) the trial court erred in admitting other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13443 - 2005-03-31
Davis of the right to a unanimous verdict; (3) the trial court erred in admitting other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13443 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sonniel R. Gidarisingh
denying his postconviction motion. He claims that the trial court erred: (1) in summarily denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14165 - 2014-09-15
denying his postconviction motion. He claims that the trial court erred: (1) in summarily denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14165 - 2014-09-15