Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36001 - 36010 of 82833 for case search.
Search results 36001 - 36010 of 82833 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
April 16, 1996, this court granted Blasnig's motion to consolidate cases numbered 96-0165-CR (appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10263 - 2017-09-20
April 16, 1996, this court granted Blasnig's motion to consolidate cases numbered 96-0165-CR (appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10263 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo Perez
1 The record of the Monroe County Circuit Court case was not appended to the record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9778 - 2017-09-19
1 The record of the Monroe County Circuit Court case was not appended to the record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9778 - 2017-09-19
Rules Hearing
of procedures for original action cases involving state legislative redistricting FILED JAN 4, 2008 David
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31397 - 2008-01-03
of procedures for original action cases involving state legislative redistricting FILED JAN 4, 2008 David
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31397 - 2008-01-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2023AP462-CRNM 2 issue that could be raised on appeal and that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842635 - 2024-08-27
. 2023AP462-CRNM 2 issue that could be raised on appeal and that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842635 - 2024-08-27
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
-sentencing in this case, constitute a new factor justifying reduction of his sentence. In essence, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10262 - 2005-03-31
-sentencing in this case, constitute a new factor justifying reduction of his sentence. In essence, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10262 - 2005-03-31
Tony Walker v. Department of Corrections
case against the eight additional defendants named in the amended complaint because they did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15834 - 2005-03-31
case against the eight additional defendants named in the amended complaint because they did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15834 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106033 - 2013-12-26
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106033 - 2013-12-26
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10143 - 2005-03-31
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10143 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10141 - 2005-03-31
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10141 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pertained to the foreclosure action and it was unable to rule on matters relating to that case. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182855 - 2017-09-21
pertained to the foreclosure action and it was unable to rule on matters relating to that case. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182855 - 2017-09-21