Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36011 - 36020 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36011 - 36020 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration. Knueppel appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33774 - 2008-08-20
vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration. Knueppel appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33774 - 2008-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and No. 2019AP418 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282373 - 2020-08-26
of the briefs and No. 2019AP418 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282373 - 2020-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
five cases coming up over this period of time …. That shows an inability to comply. But this here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795343 - 2024-05-02
five cases coming up over this period of time …. That shows an inability to comply. But this here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795343 - 2024-05-02
Frontsheet
2013 WI 94 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP1483-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104869 - 2013-11-25
2013 WI 94 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP1483-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104869 - 2013-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
plea. On October 28, 2014, Sheedy wrote the court and asked to reopen his case, though he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142621 - 2015-06-02
plea. On October 28, 2014, Sheedy wrote the court and asked to reopen his case, though he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142621 - 2015-06-02
Gene L. Olstad v. Microsoft Corporation
in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its review and determination. ISSUE: Does Wisconsin’s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1250 - 2004-02-16
in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its review and determination. ISSUE: Does Wisconsin’s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1250 - 2004-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588399 - 2022-11-10
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588399 - 2022-11-10
[PDF]
Victoria A. Bauer Unger v. Bauer Industries, Inc.
of that appeal, the parties reached a settlement agreement in the Marathon County dissolution case calling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9185 - 2017-09-19
of that appeal, the parties reached a settlement agreement in the Marathon County dissolution case calling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9185 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138551 - 2015-03-31
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138551 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James G. Freer
and frustrated a fair presentation of the case. 1 Id. ¶4 Turning to the first factor, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6330 - 2017-09-19
and frustrated a fair presentation of the case. 1 Id. ¶4 Turning to the first factor, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6330 - 2017-09-19