Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36011 - 36020 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36011 - 36020 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Antonio J. Spencer
Statutes are to the 1997-98 version unless otherwise noted. 4 This case is decided by one judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3280 - 2017-09-19
Statutes are to the 1997-98 version unless otherwise noted. 4 This case is decided by one judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3280 - 2017-09-19
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96‑0618‑FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10953 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96‑0618‑FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10953 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218230 - 2018-08-29
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218230 - 2018-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
surcharge to support a motion vacating the surcharge imposed in the instant case. Next, Neal’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15
surcharge to support a motion vacating the surcharge imposed in the instant case. Next, Neal’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion by reopening the case for additional evidence and that the officer unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118930 - 2014-08-04
exercised its discretion by reopening the case for additional evidence and that the officer unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118930 - 2014-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the victims in this case (“Sam,” “Keith,” and “Ronald”). No. 2022AP337 3 denied Brim’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
to the victims in this case (“Sam,” “Keith,” and “Ronald”). No. 2022AP337 3 denied Brim’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
and dismissing Acuity from the case. Raehl contends that the allegations against it, if proven, would give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29865 - 2014-09-15
and dismissing Acuity from the case. Raehl contends that the allegations against it, if proven, would give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29865 - 2014-09-15
Paul J. May v. Tri-County Trails Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12145 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12145 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
32, ¶29, 270 Wis. 2d 146, 677 N.W.2d 233 (collecting cases). ¶11 One exception to the economic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234113 - 2019-02-06
32, ¶29, 270 Wis. 2d 146, 677 N.W.2d 233 (collecting cases). ¶11 One exception to the economic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234113 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence in Chippewa County case 11CF104 following the revocation of his extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190762 - 2017-09-21
sentence in Chippewa County case 11CF104 following the revocation of his extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190762 - 2017-09-21