Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36011 - 36020 of 62660 for child support.
Search results 36011 - 36020 of 62660 for child support.
State v. Stephen Lavert Grant
was supported by probable cause, and his suppression motion was, therefore, properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12722 - 2005-03-31
was supported by probable cause, and his suppression motion was, therefore, properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12722 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
if it can independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standard support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
if it can independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standard support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Valgene E. Loertscher v. The Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company
denied summary judgment because the facts supported the inferences of estoppel and a relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11761 - 2017-09-20
denied summary judgment because the facts supported the inferences of estoppel and a relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11761 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
seizure has occurred, it is constitutional only if it is supported by reasonable suspicion; “[a] law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079695 - 2026-02-19
seizure has occurred, it is constitutional only if it is supported by reasonable suspicion; “[a] law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079695 - 2026-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Bryan S. Campbell
for a conviction. The evidence offered supported the court’s conclusion that there was probable cause. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2358 - 2017-09-19
for a conviction. The evidence offered supported the court’s conclusion that there was probable cause. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2358 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
produce only ‘some evidence’ in support of the privilege of self-defense.” Id. (quoting State v. Head
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207913 - 2018-02-01
produce only ‘some evidence’ in support of the privilege of self-defense.” Id. (quoting State v. Head
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207913 - 2018-02-01
Richard D. Winters, Jr. v. Marianne Cooke
of the hearing is therefore not supported by the record, and provides no basis for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31
of the hearing is therefore not supported by the record, and provides no basis for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy J. Helm
. ¶15 Helm also relies on North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), in support of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4361 - 2005-03-31
. ¶15 Helm also relies on North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), in support of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4361 - 2005-03-31
CBS, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The activity was encouraged and supported by the employer, even to the extent of providing the applicant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11900 - 2005-03-31
. The activity was encouraged and supported by the employer, even to the extent of providing the applicant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11900 - 2005-03-31
Erland Anderson v. Dale Peterson
(1975). The trial court allowed the parties to argue in support of or in opposition to the opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14608 - 2005-03-31
(1975). The trial court allowed the parties to argue in support of or in opposition to the opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14608 - 2005-03-31