Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36021 - 36030 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 36021 - 36030 of 83344 for case search.
State v. Joyce A. Neumann
, claiming that it was irrelevant and prejudicial. The trial court denied the motion, and the case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12099 - 2005-03-31
, claiming that it was irrelevant and prejudicial. The trial court denied the motion, and the case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12099 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene G.
, supports his position that this case requires a reversal and his release from custody. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
, supports his position that this case requires a reversal and his release from custody. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
he had “[n]o further questions.” Meadow Village’s counsel then rested its case, reserving Kroscher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31590 - 2008-01-22
he had “[n]o further questions.” Meadow Village’s counsel then rested its case, reserving Kroscher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31590 - 2008-01-22
State v. Patricia G.
. At the hearing, Ressie Jackson, a case manager at the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare, notified the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
. At the hearing, Ressie Jackson, a case manager at the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare, notified the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Blackmon
or is necessary for a full presentation of the case.” (quoted source omitted)); State v. Seibert, 141 Wis.2d 753
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13836 - 2005-03-31
or is necessary for a full presentation of the case.” (quoted source omitted)); State v. Seibert, 141 Wis.2d 753
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13836 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andres A. Delreal
of cases, and I have no doubt that they’re prepared to — prepared to try the case because they’ve told me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2336 - 2005-03-31
of cases, and I have no doubt that they’re prepared to — prepared to try the case because they’ve told me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2336 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and a misdemeanor charge in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2012CM746, and to recommend a sentence of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116159 - 2014-07-07
and a misdemeanor charge in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2012CM746, and to recommend a sentence of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116159 - 2014-07-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
recognized that the United States Supreme Court has moved beyond the elements-only test in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49414 - 2014-09-15
recognized that the United States Supreme Court has moved beyond the elements-only test in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this case, namely, .357-caliber rounds. But counsel argued that the “tipping point” at which the danger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18
in this case, namely, .357-caliber rounds. But counsel argued that the “tipping point” at which the danger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of the State’s case-in-chief or “at the conclusion of the entire case.” Brooks also argued that the “combined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77606 - 2012-02-06
of the State’s case-in-chief or “at the conclusion of the entire case.” Brooks also argued that the “combined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77606 - 2012-02-06