Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36031 - 36040 of 38697 for stylepulseusa.com 💥🏹 Stylepulseusa T-shirts 💥🏹 tshirt 💥🏹 3Dappeal 💥🏹 3dhoodie 💥🏹 hawaiian shirt.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Petitioners Response to Motion to Dismiss of Wisconsin Legislature and Republican Senator Respondents
, “[t]he court may deny the petition or may order the respondent to respond and may order oral argument
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030petitionersresponse.pdf - 2023-10-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 2006
reversed a ruling of the Douglas County Circuit Court, Judge Michael T. Lucci presiding. This case
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2015
counsel, he is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea.” The state contends that “[a]t a minimum, the Court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139855 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert L. Snider
of professional norms. It permitted counsel to argue in closing that “[t]hey listened to one side of the story
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5374 - 2005-03-31

State v. James F. Karls
at 423 (Geske, J. dissenting). The State, charitably, posits that “[t]his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
United States v. Long, 301 F.3d 1095, 1105 (9th Cir. 2002), for the proposition that “[t]he general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179064 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. George R. Bollig
. 1984). “[T]he distinction between ‘direct’ and collateral consequences of a plea … turns on whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14338 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, including Hougan’s testimony that Blankenship “had slurred speech.” However, “‘[i]t is the function
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the conviction relies on direct or circumstantial evidence. See id. at 503. “[T]he jury verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709013 - 2023-10-03

Madison Metropolitan School District v. School District Boundary Appeal Board
and capricious” for each agency we review. [4] The board did not consider factor number 7 “[t]he results of any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13236 - 2005-03-31