Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36041 - 36050 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36041 - 36050 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Richard F. Posius
version unless otherwise noted. No. 01-0619-CR 2 by denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3688 - 2017-09-19
version unless otherwise noted. No. 01-0619-CR 2 by denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3688 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Abdullah appeals from postconviction orders denying his related motions for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29222 - 2014-09-15
. Abdullah appeals from postconviction orders denying his related motions for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
under the age of 16, as a repeater, and the order denying his postconviction motion. Miller argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044878 - 2025-12-03
under the age of 16, as a repeater, and the order denying his postconviction motion. Miller argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044878 - 2025-12-03
Essex Insurance Company v. James Manley
court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. He contends that Essex’s summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3375 - 2005-03-31
court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. He contends that Essex’s summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
his motion for sentence modification. 1 Rychtik argues that a diagnosis of his mental health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4657 - 2017-09-19
his motion for sentence modification. 1 Rychtik argues that a diagnosis of his mental health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4657 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark J. Modory
-5- vehicle necessary to put it in motion.” In Milwaukee County v. Proegler, 95 Wis.2d 614, 291
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10304 - 2017-09-20
-5- vehicle necessary to put it in motion.” In Milwaukee County v. Proegler, 95 Wis.2d 614, 291
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10304 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denying his motion for postconviction relief seeking plea withdrawal based upon an allegedly defective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
denying his motion for postconviction relief seeking plea withdrawal based upon an allegedly defective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
on the driveway. ¶6 A motion hearing was held regarding Neumann’s contempt. The Kochs presented evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59467 - 2011-01-31
on the driveway. ¶6 A motion hearing was held regarding Neumann’s contempt. The Kochs presented evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59467 - 2011-01-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it denied his suppression motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2015AP1869-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168142 - 2017-09-21
it denied his suppression motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2015AP1869-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168142 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
HOOVER, P.J.[1] The State appeals an order granting Gary Wieczorek’s motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73522 - 2011-11-07
HOOVER, P.J.[1] The State appeals an order granting Gary Wieczorek’s motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73522 - 2011-11-07