Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36051 - 36060 of 62305 for child support.
Search results 36051 - 36060 of 62305 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
was insufficient to support the jury’s verdicts on his first-degree-reckless-injury convictions. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-11-27
was insufficient to support the jury’s verdicts on his first-degree-reckless-injury convictions. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-11-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s conclusion that there was sufficient evidence to support the circuit court’s finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263245 - 2020-06-09
counsel’s conclusion that there was sufficient evidence to support the circuit court’s finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263245 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Evraets
), to support his contention that Secor’s observations did not support reasonable suspicion for the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7247 - 2017-09-20
), to support his contention that Secor’s observations did not support reasonable suspicion for the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7247 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Oscar Jasper
regarding the battery in order to support its allegation that Jasper had violated his bond conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2824 - 2017-09-19
regarding the battery in order to support its allegation that Jasper had violated his bond conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2824 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
assume that every fact necessary to support the trial court’s exercise of discretion is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50546 - 2014-09-15
assume that every fact necessary to support the trial court’s exercise of discretion is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50546 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan S.
a court does not explicitly make a finding necessary to support its legal conclusion, we will assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5131 - 2017-09-19
a court does not explicitly make a finding necessary to support its legal conclusion, we will assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5131 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Thompson
. Moreover, our interpretation of the plain meaning of this statute is supported by its legislative history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
. Moreover, our interpretation of the plain meaning of this statute is supported by its legislative history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Edwards
that Bohling supports his position in this case because the supreme court concluded that a delay in taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
that Bohling supports his position in this case because the supreme court concluded that a delay in taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sufficient to support Wolf’s conviction. We agree with counsel that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311443 - 2020-12-08
was sufficient to support Wolf’s conviction. We agree with counsel that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311443 - 2020-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it is “entirely independent of any highway, road, or street” and does not “necessarily support[] an adjacent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524812 - 2022-05-25
it is “entirely independent of any highway, road, or street” and does not “necessarily support[] an adjacent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524812 - 2022-05-25