Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36071 - 36080 of 82649 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36071 - 36080 of 82649 for case codes/1000.
County of Washington v. Steven R. Schmit
the judgment. FACTS AND TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS ¶2 The history of this case is not disputed. Schmit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2127 - 2005-03-31
the judgment. FACTS AND TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS ¶2 The history of this case is not disputed. Schmit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2127 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm the order of the circuit court. ¶5 In order to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm the order of the circuit court. ¶5 In order to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
Donald S. Eisenberg v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 82-1914-D and 89-0596-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16850 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 82-1914-D and 89-0596-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16850 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the case. The body of the letter, in its entirety, stated: I deny the allegations contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28034 - 2014-09-15
to the case. The body of the letter, in its entirety, stated: I deny the allegations contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28034 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
or that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
or that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis C. Gandy
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether Dennis C. Gandy, who was cited for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16159 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether Dennis C. Gandy, who was cited for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16159 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191740 - 2017-09-21
and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191740 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116669 - 2014-07-15
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116669 - 2014-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was not critical to the State’s case. She merely explained her role in contacting the police, corroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101852 - 2013-09-16
was not critical to the State’s case. She merely explained her role in contacting the police, corroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101852 - 2013-09-16
Talib Amin Akbar v. Stephen Kronzer
2004 WI App 108 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-3148 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7071 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 108 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-3148 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7071 - 2005-03-31