Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36071 - 36080 of 73982 for public records.
Search results 36071 - 36080 of 73982 for public records.
State v. Randall S. Baldwin
will consider the statutes and the public policy considerations behind the statutory scheme to remove drunk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10659 - 2005-03-31
will consider the statutes and the public policy considerations behind the statutory scheme to remove drunk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10659 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael G. Artery
was appointed to do appellate work by the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD). ¶5 In the first matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21274 - 2006-02-06
was appointed to do appellate work by the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD). ¶5 In the first matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21274 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
) the State’s violation of his statutory discovery rights when it relied on a pretrial telephone recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48654 - 2014-09-15
) the State’s violation of his statutory discovery rights when it relied on a pretrial telephone recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48654 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
violation of his statutory discovery rights when it relied on a pretrial telephone recording during trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48654 - 2010-04-05
violation of his statutory discovery rights when it relied on a pretrial telephone recording during trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48654 - 2010-04-05
[PDF]
Frontsheet
state public defender. Oral argument by Andrew R. Hinkel. For the plaintiff-appellant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171110 - 2017-09-21
state public defender. Oral argument by Andrew R. Hinkel. For the plaintiff-appellant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171110 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Wright Petitioners' Brief in Support of the Wright Map
............................................................................. 4 STATEMENT ON ORAL ARGUMENT AND PUBLICATION
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224wrightmapbrief.pdf - 2024-01-12
............................................................................. 4 STATEMENT ON ORAL ARGUMENT AND PUBLICATION
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224wrightmapbrief.pdf - 2024-01-12
State v. Gregory J. Franklin
. Donnelly, assistant state public defender. For the petitioner-respondent the cause was argued by Eileen W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16416 - 2005-03-31
. Donnelly, assistant state public defender. For the petitioner-respondent the cause was argued by Eileen W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. M.
on the facts as found by the trial court, which have support in the record, we conclude Michael M. freely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2671 - 2017-09-19
on the facts as found by the trial court, which have support in the record, we conclude Michael M. freely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2671 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. See Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208791 - 2018-02-27
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. See Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208791 - 2018-02-27
Town of Delafield v. Eric Winkelman
to the record, Ledger v. City of Waupaca Bd. of Appeals, 146 Wis. 2d 256, 261, 430 N.W.2d 370 (Ct. App. 1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5143 - 2005-03-31
to the record, Ledger v. City of Waupaca Bd. of Appeals, 146 Wis. 2d 256, 261, 430 N.W.2d 370 (Ct. App. 1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5143 - 2005-03-31