Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36091 - 36100 of 57333 for id.
Search results 36091 - 36100 of 57333 for id.
State v. David M. Pleau
). This is an objective standard; the officer’s subjective opinion is irrelevant. Id. This court considers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7415 - 2005-03-31
). This is an objective standard; the officer’s subjective opinion is irrelevant. Id. This court considers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roberta L. McCormick
the circumstances under which the citizen and the suspect met. Id. at 276-77. (citations omitted). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5735 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances under which the citizen and the suspect met. Id. at 276-77. (citations omitted). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5735 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Taylor
evidence. Id. at 245-46, 421 N.W.2d at 84-85. In examining the three statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8874 - 2005-03-31
evidence. Id. at 245-46, 421 N.W.2d at 84-85. In examining the three statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8874 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the question independently. Id. Here, the circuit court’s grant of declaratory judgment turned upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160448 - 2017-09-21
the question independently. Id. Here, the circuit court’s grant of declaratory judgment turned upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick D. Dawson
has committed, was committing, or is about to commit a crime; a “hunch” will not suffice. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2594 - 2017-09-19
has committed, was committing, or is about to commit a crime; a “hunch” will not suffice. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement; and (2) circumstantial guarantees of the trustworthiness of the recantation.” Id., ¶58
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399783 - 2021-07-28
statement; and (2) circumstantial guarantees of the trustworthiness of the recantation.” Id., ¶58
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399783 - 2021-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
related in scope to the circumstances that justified the stop. Id. However, if, during a valid traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57078 - 2010-11-23
related in scope to the circumstances that justified the stop. Id. However, if, during a valid traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57078 - 2010-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, the interpretation of its language is subject to de novo review. Id., ¶15. In addition, whether sales proceeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33809 - 2008-08-26
, the interpretation of its language is subject to de novo review. Id., ¶15. In addition, whether sales proceeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33809 - 2008-08-26
State v. Harold W. Johnson
id. at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834. It is “a common sense question, which strikes a balance between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14682 - 2005-03-31
id. at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834. It is “a common sense question, which strikes a balance between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14682 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonably be obtained. Id. at 1554-55. Bearhart argues that the good faith exception recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
reasonably be obtained. Id. at 1554-55. Bearhart argues that the good faith exception recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13