Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 68326 for did.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 68326 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
. Effectiveness of Trial Counsel ¶4 In his postconviction motion, Hoeft argued that his trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28145 - 2007-02-20
. Effectiveness of Trial Counsel ¶4 In his postconviction motion, Hoeft argued that his trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28145 - 2007-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of, and did not understand, the dangers of self-representation, nor that an attorney might be able to identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110523 - 2014-04-22
of, and did not understand, the dangers of self-representation, nor that an attorney might be able to identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110523 - 2014-04-22
State v. Patty E. Jorgensen
. Anderson went to the door, but did not see anything. About five minutes later, he observed a car with its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4464 - 2005-03-31
. Anderson went to the door, but did not see anything. About five minutes later, he observed a car with its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Cooper
of alcohol on Cooper. ¶6 Defense counsel did not ask the bystander about his preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19
of alcohol on Cooper. ¶6 Defense counsel did not ask the bystander about his preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jack Gasparac v. Mae Schunk
also conclude that Schunk did not make a prima facie showing of a defense to that claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4869 - 2017-09-19
also conclude that Schunk did not make a prima facie showing of a defense to that claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4869 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the motion to suppress. The court denied Wolske’s motion to dismiss because the State did not assist Witt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134389 - 2017-09-21
as the motion to suppress. The court denied Wolske’s motion to dismiss because the State did not assist Witt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134389 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rovaughn Hill
conclude the trial court’s finding that the prosecutor did not intend to provoke a request for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2196 - 2005-03-31
conclude the trial court’s finding that the prosecutor did not intend to provoke a request for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2196 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the elements of any of his offenses, Suscha responded, “No,” each time. However, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
the elements of any of his offenses, Suscha responded, “No,” each time. However, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
to go upstairs and tell Ortiz to come down and speak with them. She did so, but returned saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3391 - 2005-03-31
to go upstairs and tell Ortiz to come down and speak with them. She did so, but returned saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court erred in concluding that there was a breach because AMBR’s complaint did not allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35688 - 2014-09-15
court erred in concluding that there was a breach because AMBR’s complaint did not allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35688 - 2014-09-15