Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 64819 for records.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 64819 for records.
[PDF]
State v. James D.B.
the $25 annual fee. ¶4 The trial court’s order must be reversed because nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15914 - 2017-09-21
the $25 annual fee. ¶4 The trial court’s order must be reversed because nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15914 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas B.
, that this discretionary choice by the juvenile court was based on evidence in the record showing Thomas’ propensity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20795 - 2017-09-21
, that this discretionary choice by the juvenile court was based on evidence in the record showing Thomas’ propensity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20795 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
conviction. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138093 - 2015-03-23
conviction. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138093 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
State v. James D.B.
because nothing in the record indicates that James has any income or assets other than his SSI benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15914 - 2005-03-31
because nothing in the record indicates that James has any income or assets other than his SSI benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214489 - 2018-06-15
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214489 - 2018-06-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
” that guideline. A sentencing court satisfies that obligation when the record of the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35457 - 2014-09-15
” that guideline. A sentencing court satisfies that obligation when the record of the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35457 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92328 - 2014-09-15
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92328 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162645 - 2017-09-21
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162645 - 2017-09-21