Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 6141 for sheriff.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
explained below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103152 - 2017-09-21
explained below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103152 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Deerfield. A witness identified Nelson to Officer Robby Vick of the Dane County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34524 - 2014-09-15
of Deerfield. A witness identified Nelson to Officer Robby Vick of the Dane County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34524 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no one came to the door. He left a card indicating that the sheriff’s department had attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92451 - 2014-09-15
no one came to the door. He left a card indicating that the sheriff’s department had attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92451 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s department sergeant who stopped Troka’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s department sergeant who stopped Troka’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm. On January 6, 2018, Winnebago County Sheriff’s Deputy Russ
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252861 - 2020-01-29
. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm. On January 6, 2018, Winnebago County Sheriff’s Deputy Russ
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252861 - 2020-01-29
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
On October 15, 1994, at 12:08 a.m., Dane County sheriff's deputy Randall P. Wiessinger saw a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
On October 15, 1994, at 12:08 a.m., Dane County sheriff's deputy Randall P. Wiessinger saw a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. A sheriff’s office evidence technician testified that she located two small stains in the area of the room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
. A sheriff’s office evidence technician testified that she located two small stains in the area of the room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Sheila K. LaFortune
The facts are undisputed. At approximately 12:15 a.m. on January 11, 2002, the Brown County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
The facts are undisputed. At approximately 12:15 a.m. on January 11, 2002, the Brown County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
Crosse County Sheriff's Department, testified that Mark admitted that he sexually abused his two step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31
Crosse County Sheriff's Department, testified that Mark admitted that he sexually abused his two step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Vick of the Dane County Sheriff’s Department as the owner of the vehicle that caused the collision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34524 - 2008-11-05
Vick of the Dane County Sheriff’s Department as the owner of the vehicle that caused the collision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34524 - 2008-11-05