Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 58277 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a dangerous weapon and as a repeat offender. Brush contends that the trial court erred when it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33716 - 2014-09-15
of a dangerous weapon and as a repeat offender. Brush contends that the trial court erred when it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33716 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after a jury trial of three counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child and an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98322 - 2014-09-15
after a jury trial of three counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child and an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98322 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brian J. Salentine
. The trial court nonetheless concluded that he competently submitted an Alford[1] plea to charges that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10122 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court nonetheless concluded that he competently submitted an Alford[1] plea to charges that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert G. Harkey
argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that evidence was improperly admitted. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11408 - 2017-09-19
argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that evidence was improperly admitted. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11408 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Sanchez
(2003-04).[1] Sanchez argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when, before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7221 - 2005-03-31
(2003-04).[1] Sanchez argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when, before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7221 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The trial court conducted a plea colloquy with Booker, accepted Booker’s guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174957 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision. The trial court conducted a plea colloquy with Booker, accepted Booker’s guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174957 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert G. Harkey
denying his postconviction motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11081 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert G. Harkey
argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that evidence was improperly admitted. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11081 - 2017-09-19
argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that evidence was improperly admitted. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11081 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. Nommensen seeks a new trial in the interest of justice because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67746 - 2014-09-15
motion for postconviction relief. Nommensen seeks a new trial in the interest of justice because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67746 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred when it applied the wrong legal standard to his presentence motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33716 - 2008-08-12
that the trial court erred when it applied the wrong legal standard to his presentence motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33716 - 2008-08-12