Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3611 - 3620 of 7497 for ye.

State v. James A. Fritz, Jr.
of a witness's three prior convictions are admissible, the witness is instructed to answer the questions: “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11059 - 2005-03-31

State v. George R. Bollig
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, you understand that? Bollig: Yes I do. Court: And that means the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14338 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Julian Lopez
? [JULIAN LOPEZ’S LAWYER]: Yes. THE COURT: Have you discussed that with him so you’re not requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6675 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. James A. Fritz, Jr.
, the witness is instructed to answer the questions: “yes” and “two,” even though “three” is the factually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11059 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
yes, because I haven’t looked at it in a while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=579413 - 2022-10-18

COURT OF APPEALS
“be able to listen to that and render a fair and impartial verdict.” Tutaj answered, “Yes.” The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82149 - 2012-05-08

[PDF] P
24 10 C R S ta te v . J im m ye R ic ha rd so n1 11 -2 7- 20 12 A ff ir m ed
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91682 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
you have a right to file a lawsuit or make a claim for money against somebody? MW: Yes. T: Who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240442 - 2019-05-09

State v. Randolph S. Miller
replied “yes” to both questions. ¶24 Counsel is required to abide by Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5555 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] P
A rt hu r D . D ye r v. P au l L aw 10 -0 1- 20 08 A ff ir m ed 20 07 A P 00 25
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34821 - 2014-09-15